---
title: Model Building with BoFire
jupyter: python3
---
This notebooks shows how to setup and analyze models trained with BoFire.
## Imports
```{python}
#| papermill: {duration: 2.690868, end_time: '2024-10-10T20:34:24.683197', exception: false, start_time: '2024-10-10T20:34:21.992329', status: completed}
#| tags: []
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import shap
import bofire.surrogates.api as surrogates
from bofire.data_models.domain.api import Inputs, Outputs
from bofire.data_models.enum import RegressionMetricsEnum
from bofire.data_models.features.api import ContinuousInput, ContinuousOutput
from bofire.data_models.surrogates.api import SingleTaskGPSurrogate
from bofire.plot.cv_folds import plot_cv_folds_plotly
from bofire.plot.feature_importance import plot_feature_importance_by_feature_plotly
from bofire.plot.gp_slice import plot_gp_slice_plotly
from bofire.surrogates.feature_importance import (
combine_lengthscale_importances,
combine_permutation_importances,
lengthscale_importance_hook,
permutation_importance_hook,
shap_importance,
shap_importance_hook,
)
```
## Problem Setup
For didactic purposes, we sample data from a Himmelblau benchmark function and use them to train a SingleTaskGP.
```{python}
#| papermill: {duration: 0.010285, end_time: '2024-10-10T20:34:24.696815', exception: false, start_time: '2024-10-10T20:34:24.686530', status: completed}
#| tags: []
input_features = Inputs(
features=[ContinuousInput(key=f"x_{i+1}", bounds=(-4, 4)) for i in range(3)],
)
output_features = Outputs(features=[ContinuousOutput(key="y")])
experiments = input_features.sample(n=50)
experiments.eval("y=((x_1**2 + x_2 - 11)**2+(x_1 + x_2**2 -7)**2)", inplace=True, engine = "python")
experiments["valid_y"] = 1
experiments["labcode"] = "exp_" + experiments.index.astype(str)
```
## Cross Validation
### Run the cross validation
```{python}
#| papermill: {duration: 0.229142, end_time: '2024-10-10T20:34:24.929279', exception: true, start_time: '2024-10-10T20:34:24.700137', status: failed}
#| tags: []
data_model = SingleTaskGPSurrogate(
inputs=input_features,
outputs=output_features,
)
model = surrogates.map(data_model=data_model)
train_cv, test_cv, pi = model.cross_validate(
experiments,
folds=5,
include_X = True,
include_labcodes = True,
hooks={
"permutation_importance": permutation_importance_hook,
"lengthscale_importance": lengthscale_importance_hook,
"shap_importance": shap_importance_hook,
},
)
```
### Plot feature importance
```{python}
#| papermill: {duration: null, end_time: null, exception: null, start_time: null, status: pending}
#| tags: []
shap_folds = pi["shap_importance"] # list[dict[str, shap.Explanation]]
shap_mean_abs_per_fold = pd.DataFrame(
[
pd.Series(
np.mean(np.abs(fold["y"].values), axis=0),
index=fold["y"].feature_names,
)
for fold in shap_folds
]
)
combined_importances = {
m.name: combine_permutation_importances(pi["permutation_importance"], m).describe()
for m in RegressionMetricsEnum
}
combined_importances["lengthscale"] = combine_lengthscale_importances(
pi["lengthscale_importance"],
).describe()
combined_importances["shap"] = shap_mean_abs_per_fold.describe()
plot_feature_importance_by_feature_plotly(
combined_importances,
relative=False,
caption="Feature Importances",
show_std=True,
importance_measure="Importance",
)
```
### Analyze the cross validation
```{python}
#| papermill: {duration: null, end_time: null, exception: null, start_time: null, status: pending}
#| tags: []
# Performance on test sets
test_cv.get_metrics(combine_folds=False)
```
```{python}
#| papermill: {duration: null, end_time: null, exception: null, start_time: null, status: pending}
#| tags: []
display(test_cv.get_metrics(combine_folds=False))
display(test_cv.get_metrics(combine_folds=False).describe())
```
### Plot Folds
```{python}
plot_cv_folds_plotly(test_cv, plot_X=True, plot_labcodes=True, plot_uncertainties=True)
```
### Plot a slice of the GP
In this slice plot, we vary the inputs x_1 and x_2 across their full bounds to create a grid, while keeping x_3 fixed at a selected value.
The outputs are two Plotly figures: one showing the GP's predicted mean (fig_mean) and the other showing the predicted standard deviation or uncertainty (fig_sd) over the slice.
If observed_data=experiments is provided, the mean plot will also display the measured data points, with those matching the fixed value of x_3 highlighted separately.
```{python}
fixed_input_features = [model.inputs.get_by_key("x_3")]
fixed_values = [0.0]
varied_input_features = [
model.inputs.get_by_key("x_1"),
model.inputs.get_by_key("x_2"),
]
output_feature = model.outputs.get_by_key("y")
fixed_values = [experiments.iloc[0]["x_3"]]
fig_mean, fig_sd = plot_gp_slice_plotly(
surrogate=model,
fixed_input_features=fixed_input_features,
fixed_values=fixed_values,
varied_input_features=varied_input_features,
output_feature=output_feature,
resolution=80,
observed_data=experiments,
)
display(fig_mean)
display(fig_sd)
```
### Shapley Plots
```{python}
shap_explanations = shap_importance(
predictor=model,
experiments=experiments,
bg_experiments=experiments, # background for KernelSHAP
bg_sample_size=50,
seed=42,
)
exp = shap_explanations['y']
shap.summary_plot(exp.values, exp.data, feature_names=exp.feature_names)
```
